ReliabilityIntelligence logoReliabilityIntelligence
01 / Score

Reliability Score

0–100 rating across engine, transmission, electrical and more.

02 / Faults

Common Issues

Known problems by mileage with severity ratings.

03 / Cost

Repair Costs

Most used currency of the selected continent, always.

Methodology

How the scores are built

We combine real-world failure data with regional repair costs so you get a score that reflects actual ownership experience, not marketing claims.

01 / Collect

Aggregate real-world data

Official registries, inspection statistics, road service reports, owner forums, and technical service bulletins are pulled together for the exact model, engine, or transmission you searched.

02 / Verify

Cross-check sources

Recalls, consumer agency findings, and regional defect reports are matched against reported symptoms to separate isolated faults from systemic patterns.

03 / Score

Weight and rate

Each issue is scored by frequency, severity, and typical mileage. The result is a 0–100 reliability index with component breakdowns you can act on.

Data sources
Official registries & recalls
Inspection statistics
Road service & breakdown data
Consumer agencies & magazines
Owner forums & communities
Technical service bulletins
Regional parts & labour rates
Model-specific engineering data

Scores are possible because modern vehicles leave a long trail of structured data — recalls, inspection failures, warranty claims, and owner reports. We normalize that trail into one clear number.

Worked example

From raw findings to a score

Pick a model to see how component ratings and reported issues combine into one reliability index and a rating class.

Step 1 — Component ratings
Engine30% · 68/100
Transmission20% · 72/100
Electrical20% · 74/100
Suspension & brakes15% · 84/100
Body & interior15% · 88/100

Weighted average = 75 points. Safety-critical systems carry more weight than cosmetic ones.

Step 2 — Issue deductions
Timing chain tensioner wear
Common · 60–120k km
6
Water pump / thermostat leak
Common · 80–140k km
4
Carbon build-up on intake valves
Occasional · 100k+ km
2
DSG mechatronic faults
Rare · 120k+ km
1

Total deduction = −13 points. Each penalty scales with how often the fault appears and how expensive it is to fix.

Step 3 — Final index
7513 = 62

Weighted base minus issue deductions gives the 0–100 reliability index.

Step 4 — Rating class
Average — budget for maintenance

85–100 Excellent · 70–84 Good · 55–69 Average · 40–54 Weak · below 40 Poor.

What it means

A usable everyday car, but the timing chain and cooling system should be checked before buying and reserved for in the running costs.

Scale — Where this model sits

Reliability index 0–100

The same index is used for every report. The marker shows where the selected example lands among the five rating classes.

62
Average — budget for maintenance
62
0255075100
Poor
0–39
Weak
40–54
Average
55–69
Good
70–84
Excellent
85–100

Example figures are illustrative. Every search recalculates the same steps with live data for the exact model, engine, year, and region you choose.

AI vs methodology

Why use Norjin if AI exists?

AI answers questions

AI can use different data and its answers can depend on how a question is asked.

Norjin evaluates vehicles

Norjin uses a consistent methodology to evaluate every vehicle based on the same criteria, making vehicle comparisons more consistent and comparable.

Reporting an issue needs a free account

Create a free account to report incorrect data or cost estimates — and follow the status of your reports.

Free forever — no card required.

Estimates are for guidance, not professional appraisals.